Lads and Lassies, we have a winner! Several winners, in fact. Pictured here are the first and second place winners in the Traditional Shortbread category for the first annual Shortbread Baking Contest at the Sacramento Valley Scottish Games, 2010.
First place winner (holding the trophy on the left) is Tim McLaren. On the right is second place winner Isabelle Duncan. I will post the names of the other contest winners (third place traditional, non-traditional and junior category winners) as soon as I can track them down.
The shortbread contest is a fundraiser for the Betty Connelly Scholarship Fund for the Scottish Performing Arts, sponsored by the Daughters of Scotia, Sacramento. This fund awards scholarships to pipers, drummers and dancers who keep traditional Scottish arts alive. The Daughters of Scotia awarded several scholarships at the Games this year.
I was also a (non-winning) participant in the shortbread contest. I entered in both categories: traditional and non-traditional.
At first, I was only going to enter in the non-traditional category. My reasoning for this was The Intimidation Factor. In fact, never having entered a cooking or baking contest before, the whole event was kind of spooky for me. It was only my Scottish pride that prompted me to get involved. And although I had made shortbread before, I was not at all sure that my recipe or technique was strictly "traditional". I didn't want to embarrass myself. So initially I focused on the non-traditional recipe. However, after finding a special and very old shortbread recipe, my genetic predispositions kicked in and I did enter a traditional recipe shortbread as well-- and even though it was not a winner, I am SO GLAD I did. More on that later.
Here is a glimpse of the entries in the traditional and Categories:
And here are the non-traditional shortbreads:
There were junior baker (age 16 or under) entries as well, although I am not sure they are among those pictured.
Each entry into the contest was dropped off, with an entry form and fee paid, at the contest table by 11 am Saturday. Shortly before 1 pm, contest judges arrived and began sampling from each plate, marking their impressions on a form.
Finally, the judges' points were tallied and winners were announced to the small crowd of shortbread enthusiasts huddled nearby.
The first place trophy was an engraved serving plate, with ribbons and gift certificates being awarded in every other category as well.
Winning entries:
A HUMBLE CONTEST REVIEW (no sour grapes included, I promise)
My only disappointment with the contest (other than not winning, of course! --whimper, pout--) was the lack of feedback from the judges about the shortbreads they tasted. I would have loved a short statement about each winning entry. What was it they found to be especially good or exciting about it? This would have been satisfying to the winners, but also an education for those in the audience, who are anxious to learn what the judges are looking for in a particularly good shortbread. After all, they had a list of qualities they used to grade the entries. I'd love to know what was on their list.
The non-traditional recipe category was also a big tease. Beyond the few visual clues (chocolate on one, a clever
Saltire design on another, the perhaps distressing herbal coloration of my own entry), there was no way of knowing what was unique and non-traditional about it. When one of the contest organizers asked me "Is that made with wheat flour?" I said, "No, it's a mint pesto", she visibly blanched. Later my husband thought he heard someone say one of the entries was made with "olive oil." I certainly hope it was not confused with my own, which had no oil in it (the only fat coming from butter). The word "
pesto" may have made for the wrong impression for someone unfamiliar with the modern use of the term. Presumably the taste buds of the judges were their foremost assessment device. In any case, a simple title for each non-traditional recipe might have given clues to the tantalizing flavors within.
All of the contest entries appeared to be on paper plates, covered with plastic wrap as instructed by the entry rules. However I did wonder to what extent the presentation would be considered by the judges. Certainly the visual qualities of the shortbread itself would be a factor. But would the plate itself matter? The contest rules hinted that more leeway in such matters would be afforded the non-traditional entries. More clarity in the rules about this will be welcome in coming years.
When the contest was over, I enjoyed taking a few photographs and chatting with a couple of the delighted winners. (Entrants needed not be present to win). I especially thought the second place winner, Isabelle, had the prettiest shortbread on offer, and was glad to tell her so.
Luckily for me, the first place winner offered a taste of his winning entry over at
his booth on the fairgrounds. I ambled over and sampled it, and it was in fact delicious: A lovely soft-dense crumb and lightly sweet crunch. It was then that I had the opportunity to learn what to look for in a traditional shortbread. I also offered him a taste of my own offerings. I was pleased to learn that he thought it quite good, and that the color was the proper light golden-tan color. His only advice to me was to make it thicker, as my shortbread was only about 1/4 inch thick. So noted. I can hardly wait to make another batch!
It would have been nice to have won that trophy, especially since it also had my birthday (April 24) inscribed on it! But the real prize was rediscovering the infinite joys of shortbread, and a new favorite recipe, and most of all the close knit community of bakers who revel in this most Scottish of delicacies.
Next article: My own shortbread recipes: Traditional (and fabulous!) and my original Honey Mint Pesto Shortbread.